TY - JOUR
T1 - Peer-Mentor Support for Older, Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Mixed Methods Process-Outcome Evaluation.
AU - Pedersen, Maria Kjøller
AU - Petersen, Rikke Agnete
AU - Boateng, Takyiwa
AU - Egerod, Ingrid
AU - Overgaard, Dorthe
AU - Bennich, Birgitte Bøcher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Advanced Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/2/28
Y1 - 2025/2/28
N2 - Aim: To achieve a deeper understanding of the results of a primary randomised controlled trial to clarify the potential effective mechanisms and barriers of a peer-mentor intervention. Design: Mixed methods process-outcome evaluation of the intervention. Method: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected during the intervention in a during-trial set-up, that is, a convergent design. Results: The qualitative and quantitative findings mostly confirmed and expanded each other, identifying several mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of peer-mentor support during cardiac rehabilitation, such as mentors' experience-based knowledge and motivation. However, barriers related to lifestyle changes among older, vulnerable patients (e.g., mentee concerns about heart-healthy diets) and psychological outcomes (e.g., mentees' resilience) may minimise the effectiveness. Conclusion: Peer-mentoring holds potential for supporting older, vulnerable patients during cardiac rehabilitation. However, ensuring that peer-mentors are well-suited for their role and capable of providing motivational, experience-based support is crucial, as is the need for tailored mentorship and consideration of specific patient populations needing mentor-supported cardiac rehabilitation. Implications and Impact: Cardiac rehabilitation faces challenges due to high drop-out rates, particularly among older individuals, females, and vulnerable patients. Peer mentoring, a low-cost intervention, holds promise for supporting these groups in cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Reporting Method: The study adheres to the ‘Systematic Development of Standards for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation Health Sciences Research’, ‘Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study’ and ‘Template for Intervention Description and Replication’. Patient and Public Contribution: A group of patients with cardiovascular disease actively contributed to developing and implementing the intervention. Trial and Protocol Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04945486—prospectively registered before the first participant was recruited.
AB - Aim: To achieve a deeper understanding of the results of a primary randomised controlled trial to clarify the potential effective mechanisms and barriers of a peer-mentor intervention. Design: Mixed methods process-outcome evaluation of the intervention. Method: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected during the intervention in a during-trial set-up, that is, a convergent design. Results: The qualitative and quantitative findings mostly confirmed and expanded each other, identifying several mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of peer-mentor support during cardiac rehabilitation, such as mentors' experience-based knowledge and motivation. However, barriers related to lifestyle changes among older, vulnerable patients (e.g., mentee concerns about heart-healthy diets) and psychological outcomes (e.g., mentees' resilience) may minimise the effectiveness. Conclusion: Peer-mentoring holds potential for supporting older, vulnerable patients during cardiac rehabilitation. However, ensuring that peer-mentors are well-suited for their role and capable of providing motivational, experience-based support is crucial, as is the need for tailored mentorship and consideration of specific patient populations needing mentor-supported cardiac rehabilitation. Implications and Impact: Cardiac rehabilitation faces challenges due to high drop-out rates, particularly among older individuals, females, and vulnerable patients. Peer mentoring, a low-cost intervention, holds promise for supporting these groups in cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Reporting Method: The study adheres to the ‘Systematic Development of Standards for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation Health Sciences Research’, ‘Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study’ and ‘Template for Intervention Description and Replication’. Patient and Public Contribution: A group of patients with cardiovascular disease actively contributed to developing and implementing the intervention. Trial and Protocol Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04945486—prospectively registered before the first participant was recruited.
U2 - 10.1111/jan.16899
DO - 10.1111/jan.16899
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0309-2402
JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing
JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing
ER -