Simple formula for adjusted performance parameters in evaluation of diagnostic methods

Clausen Frederik Banch; Alberte Aspaas  Lundquist; Emil Urhammer; Klaus Rieneck; Leif Kofoed Nielsen

doi:10.1111/trf.17989

Simple formula for adjusted performance parameters in evaluation of diagnostic methods

Clausen Frederik Banch, Alberte Aspaas Lundquist, Emil Urhammer, Klaus Rieneck, Leif Kofoed Nielsen

Sundhed og Teknologi - Institut for Teknologiske Uddannelser

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftsartikel › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

In medical science, diagnostic methods are validated and evaluated using certain diagnostic performance parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value,1, 2 see Box 1. In the presence of a reference method, these performance characteristics can easily be calculated to evaluate the performance of a new method. Such performance characteristics are also widely used for comparing one method with another method or to evaluate the performance of a methodology, for example, through comparative analysis such as systematical review or meta-analysis.3

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Transfusion
Vol/bind	64
Udgave nummer	10
Sider (fra-til)	2014-2018
Antal sider	5
ISSN	0041-1132
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17989
Status	Udgivet - okt. 2024

Emneord

Kliniske undersøgelsesmetoder, laboratorieteknologi og radiografi
Sygdom, sundhedsvidenskab og sygepleje
Undersøgelsesdesign, teori og metode

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1111/trf.17989

Citationsformater

@article{d95728ae76124655bb367eda40a3770c,

title = "Simple formula for adjusted performance parameters in evaluation of diagnostic methods",

abstract = "In medical science, diagnostic methods are validated and evaluated using certain diagnostic performance parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value,1, 2 see Box 1. In the presence of a reference method, these performance characteristics can easily be calculated to evaluate the performance of a new method. Such performance characteristics are also widely used for comparing one method with another method or to evaluate the performance of a methodology, for example, through comparative analysis such as systematical review or meta-analysis.3",

keywords = "clinical assessment methods, lab technology and radiography, disease, health science and nursing, research designs, theory and method",

author = "{Frederik Banch}, Clausen and Lundquist, {Alberte Aspaas} and Emil Urhammer and Klaus Rieneck and Nielsen, {Leif Kofoed}",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1111/trf.17989",

language = "English",

volume = "64",

pages = "2014--2018",

journal = "Transfusion",

issn = "0041-1132",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simple formula for adjusted performance parameters in evaluation of diagnostic methods

AU - Frederik Banch, Clausen

AU - Lundquist, Alberte Aspaas

AU - Urhammer, Emil

AU - Rieneck, Klaus

AU - Nielsen, Leif Kofoed

PY - 2024/10

Y1 - 2024/10

N2 - In medical science, diagnostic methods are validated and evaluated using certain diagnostic performance parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value,1, 2 see Box 1. In the presence of a reference method, these performance characteristics can easily be calculated to evaluate the performance of a new method. Such performance characteristics are also widely used for comparing one method with another method or to evaluate the performance of a methodology, for example, through comparative analysis such as systematical review or meta-analysis.3

AB - In medical science, diagnostic methods are validated and evaluated using certain diagnostic performance parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value,1, 2 see Box 1. In the presence of a reference method, these performance characteristics can easily be calculated to evaluate the performance of a new method. Such performance characteristics are also widely used for comparing one method with another method or to evaluate the performance of a methodology, for example, through comparative analysis such as systematical review or meta-analysis.3

KW - clinical assessment methods, lab technology and radiography

KW - disease, health science and nursing

KW - research designs, theory and method

U2 - 10.1111/trf.17989

DO - 10.1111/trf.17989

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0041-1132

VL - 64

SP - 2014

EP - 2018

JO - Transfusion

JF - Transfusion

IS - 10

ER -

Simple formula for adjusted performance parameters in evaluation of diagnostic methods

Abstract

Emneord

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater