TY - JOUR
T1 - The limits of organisational resilience
AU - Taarup, Jacob
PY - 2023/9/10
Y1 - 2023/9/10
N2 - This paper explores the limits of organisational resilience and introduces an alternative conceptualisation through the concept of ‘temporary adaptive capacity’. The proposition is that networks of loosely coupled socio-technical systems can unite under a joint governance structure to increase their combined capacity to protect themselves against a time-limited common threat. This conceptual framework differs from contemporary approaches to organisational resilience by utilising networks of systems, contrary to what has traditionally been an organisational-centric understanding of resilience. The conceptual shift is found in the ability of otherwise unrelated socio-technical systems to combine their resources, management, and governance systems to increase their overall capacity to identify, manage, and recover from what would otherwise be a disastrous event. The proposition is that such an approach maintains the initiative during an event, as it can adapt when norms and practices no longer have agreed outputs. To illustrate the utility of such a network approach, an example from Greenland where six communities face a possible catastrophic landslide and tsunami event. While the communities, from a traditional resilience perspective, would be considered vulnerable, they do display temporary adaptive capacity that they can operationalise during a disaster. They develop solutions and workarounds using existing knowledge and resources to achieve desired results.
AB - This paper explores the limits of organisational resilience and introduces an alternative conceptualisation through the concept of ‘temporary adaptive capacity’. The proposition is that networks of loosely coupled socio-technical systems can unite under a joint governance structure to increase their combined capacity to protect themselves against a time-limited common threat. This conceptual framework differs from contemporary approaches to organisational resilience by utilising networks of systems, contrary to what has traditionally been an organisational-centric understanding of resilience. The conceptual shift is found in the ability of otherwise unrelated socio-technical systems to combine their resources, management, and governance systems to increase their overall capacity to identify, manage, and recover from what would otherwise be a disastrous event. The proposition is that such an approach maintains the initiative during an event, as it can adapt when norms and practices no longer have agreed outputs. To illustrate the utility of such a network approach, an example from Greenland where six communities face a possible catastrophic landslide and tsunami event. While the communities, from a traditional resilience perspective, would be considered vulnerable, they do display temporary adaptive capacity that they can operationalise during a disaster. They develop solutions and workarounds using existing knowledge and resources to achieve desired results.
KW - risk management
KW - resilience engineering
KW - Arctic
KW - Tsunami
UR - https://rpsonline.com.sg/proceedings/esrel2023/pdf/P038.pdf
U2 - 10.3850/978-981-18-8071-1_P038-cd
DO - 10.3850/978-981-18-8071-1_P038-cd
M3 - Journal article
VL - 33
SP - 2762
EP - 2771
JO - Proceedings of the 33rd European Safety and Reliability Conference
JF - Proceedings of the 33rd European Safety and Reliability Conference
ER -