The performativity of (non)sense-making: Reflexive leadership in the Danish public sector

Rasmus Bergmann, Mie Plotnikof

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftAbstraktForskningpeer review


While traditionally downgraded in favour of quick and decisive action, reflexivity has recently been highlighted as key to modern leadership practice (Alvesson, Blom, & Sveningson, 2017; Broussine & Ahmad, 2013; Cunliffe & Jun, 2005). Considered as the ambition and ability to question dominant beliefs and expectation and to ponder about alternatives, reflexivity destabilizes organizational order, whereas lack of reflexivity conversely contributes to maintaining and strengthening this order (Alvesson & Spicer, 2012). Despite its status as a buzzword in the leadership literature, reflexivity still only takes up a minor part of the curriculum in most management education programs (Parker, 2018). This is probably because questioning organizational rules and routines can be perceived as threatening and needless, especially if you as a student are looking for tools to simplify your leadership practice (Cunliffe, 2009; Parker, 2016). However, ongoing debates about critical reflexivity and critical performativity suggest that reflexivity is of key importance to develop more collaborative, responsive, and ethical ways of leading organizations (Broussine & Ahmad, 2013; Cunliffe, 2004; Cunliffe & Jun, 2005).
StatusUdgivet - 2019
Begivenhed11th International Critical Management Studies Conference: Precarious Presents, Open Futures - The Open University, Milton Keynes, Storbritannien
Varighed: 27 jun. 201929 jun. 2019
Konferencens nummer: 11


Konference11th International Critical Management Studies Conference
LokationThe Open University
ByMilton Keynes


  • Ledelse, organisationsudvikling og innovation


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The performativity of (non)sense-making: Reflexive leadership in the Danish public sector'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.