Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss some of the ways in which health education research can engage with criticality and normativity by bringing a close reading of selected key concepts by the educational theorist Wolfgang Klafki (1927-2016) into dialogue with the sociologist and philosopher Jürgen Habermas (1929- ). Out point of departure is that there is no definite rational system that determines what good health education is, and which can assist in justifying pedagogical choices and actions. Health education as practice is always normative; it involves value-based, ethical and moral deliberations, even if these are always in motion, (re)negotiated, configured and enacted on the trajectories between global, national and local actors. Consequently, research in health education needs to engage with normativity, that is, to consider the dynamic links between normative and other (e.g. theory, policy and practice related) educational questions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Social Theory and Health Education : Forging New Insights in Research |
| Editors | Deana Leahy, Katie Fitzpatrick, Jan Wright |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Publication date | 2020 |
| Pages | 206-217 |
| Chapter | 19 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138485754, 9781138485730 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781351048163 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- health, nutrition and quality of life
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Engaging with Normativity in Health Education Research: Inspiration from Continental Critical Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver