How contradictions in professional practices become contradictions in research practices

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Within child and childhood research, contextual approaches are foregrounded, thus emphasizing children as active agents who take part in the social world and who thereby challenge and reproduce everyday social practices. However, child researchers seem to differ when it comes to understanding and exploring the social engagement of children and adults as either separated or interwoven. When understanding the engagement of children and adults as two separate things, adults are positioned as potentially disturbing the children, who are in turn doing what they themselves choose to. Accordingly, adults are to distance themselves from adult perceptions of children. From the position of an adult researcher, this would suggest a position of ‘least adult’. As an alternative, this article proposes that adults and children are involved in a common social practice and that, in consequence, their arrangements are interwoven and interdependent. The researcher is also involved in this common social practice and thereby becomes entangled in conflicts within this practice. Finally, this article calls for further investigations into how conflicts in professional practice also become conflicts in research practice.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOutlines
Volume19
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
ISSN1904-0210
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2018

Keywords

  • children and youth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How contradictions in professional practices become contradictions in research practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this