TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of the individual placement and support approach
T2 - facilitators and barriers
AU - Bonfils, Inge Storgaard
AU - Hansen, Henrik
AU - Stentoft Dalum, Helle
AU - Falgaard Eplov, Lene
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Nordic Network on Disability Research.
PY - 2017/10/2
Y1 - 2017/10/2
N2 - The individual placement and support approach (IPS) has become a widely recognized evidence-based practice to provide work for more people with severe mental illness. The aim of this literature review was to identify and evaluate research on implementation of IPS, focusing on facilitators and barriers. Contextual, local organizational, cooperation/team and individual factors influence the implementation process. Key facilitators are the use of a fidelity scale to measure and develop quality and the employment of skilled local leaders and IPS specialists. Barriers are located at the contextual level, when the national employment policy and regulation contradict the IPS scheme, and at the local level, where mental health professionals’ negative attitudes towards the IPS scheme and a culture based on a medical approach challenge the implementation of IPS. The evaluation of research in IPS implementation show that most studies are empirically driven, using different understandings of implementation and have a poor theoretical underpinning of the studies. The need for further studies based on comparative methods and more developed theoretical framework is discussed.
AB - The individual placement and support approach (IPS) has become a widely recognized evidence-based practice to provide work for more people with severe mental illness. The aim of this literature review was to identify and evaluate research on implementation of IPS, focusing on facilitators and barriers. Contextual, local organizational, cooperation/team and individual factors influence the implementation process. Key facilitators are the use of a fidelity scale to measure and develop quality and the employment of skilled local leaders and IPS specialists. Barriers are located at the contextual level, when the national employment policy and regulation contradict the IPS scheme, and at the local level, where mental health professionals’ negative attitudes towards the IPS scheme and a culture based on a medical approach challenge the implementation of IPS. The evaluation of research in IPS implementation show that most studies are empirically driven, using different understandings of implementation and have a poor theoretical underpinning of the studies. The need for further studies based on comparative methods and more developed theoretical framework is discussed.
KW - social work and social conditions
KW - IPS
KW - psykisk sygdom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028441120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15017419.2016.1222306
DO - 10.1080/15017419.2016.1222306
M3 - Review article
SN - 1501-7419
VL - 19
SP - 318
EP - 333
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
IS - 4
ER -