Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Peer-Mentor Support for Older, Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Mixed Methods Process-Outcome Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Aim: To achieve a deeper understanding of the results of a primary randomised controlled trial to clarify the potential effective mechanisms and barriers of a peer-mentor intervention. Design: Mixed methods process-outcome evaluation of the intervention. Method: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected during the intervention in a during-trial set-up, that is, a convergent design. Results: The qualitative and quantitative findings mostly confirmed and expanded each other, identifying several mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of peer-mentor support during cardiac rehabilitation, such as mentors' experience-based knowledge and motivation. However, barriers related to lifestyle changes among older, vulnerable patients (e.g., mentee concerns about heart-healthy diets) and psychological outcomes (e.g., mentees' resilience) may minimise the effectiveness. Conclusion: Peer-mentoring holds potential for supporting older, vulnerable patients during cardiac rehabilitation. However, ensuring that peer-mentors are well-suited for their role and capable of providing motivational, experience-based support is crucial, as is the need for tailored mentorship and consideration of specific patient populations needing mentor-supported cardiac rehabilitation. Implications and Impact: Cardiac rehabilitation faces challenges due to high drop-out rates, particularly among older individuals, females, and vulnerable patients. Peer mentoring, a low-cost intervention, holds promise for supporting these groups in cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Reporting Method: The study adheres to the ‘Systematic Development of Standards for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation Health Sciences Research’, ‘Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study’ and ‘Template for Intervention Description and Replication’. Patient and Public Contribution: A group of patients with cardiovascular disease actively contributed to developing and implementing the intervention. Trial and Protocol Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04945486—prospectively registered before the first participant was recruited.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume81
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)8946–8958
Number of pages13
ISSN0309-2402
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • disease, health science and nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peer-Mentor Support for Older, Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Mixed Methods Process-Outcome Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this